A critically important goal in the age of AI
Resilience
A critically important goal in the age of AI
Today’s work began with yet another task — we were designing a new directory with GPT. But it ended with something much larger: observing my own psyche, recognizing the particular way I interact with AI, and understanding the importance of setting a focus.
📁 We broke down two approaches to building a system:
-
Idea first → structure second (intuitive);
-
Structure first → implementation second (architectural).
Each proved useful at the right moment. But that was not the main point.
The main point was that AI itself helped me reflect on all of this today.
🧠 Thoughts that yesterday evening seemed like unformed chaos acquired structure today. Not because I systematized them on my own, but because interacting with AI makes it possible to see: “yes, this is possible — and here is what it would require.” That fundamentally changes the inner dynamics of decision-making.
🤖 Artificial intelligence, in a sense, “permits” thoughts. It removes the filter marked “impossible.” And that creates a central psychological dilemma:
🜃 If fantasy could once remain fantasy, now almost every idea looks implementable. That is both a power and a risk.
💡 Possibility is not necessity. I am glad that before encountering AI I had already read quite a lot. Today I was listening again to an audiobook by Sean Covey, son of Stephen Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. The newer book was titled How to Achieve Your Goal in the Russian edition, and it returned me to an idea that now sounds especially clear to me: the WIG — the Wildly Important Goal, what I had been calling the critically important goal.
🔬 Once you enter into contact with AI, old constraints begin to disappear. But that means a new discipline has to come from within. Not from other people. From you.
🧑🏫 GPT will not say: “No, that is impossible.” It will answer: “Yes, it is possible, if...” And that “if” becomes a mirror — it shows what you are prepared to do for your fantasy.
🧑🎓 A new kind of learning: AI feedback does not block, it expands. And that expansion itself requires a new way of thinking. We are no longer protected by external prohibitions. We have to introduce our own new “I don’t want to” and “I won’t” — for the sake of the WIG.
🅾 THE CHALLENGE OF THE 21ST CENTURY
Yesterday I probably would not even have begun formulating these thoughts. Today they became a post. Why?
Because without GPT I would not have reached this level of structure. Interaction with AI changes how I think. More than that, it creates a particular kind of feedback in which ideas are not blocked. There is support and unfolding.
🔬 It is a kind of extended “social reinforcement” inside the cognitive architecture of communication: AI creates an environment where the threat response is less likely to activate and a mode of “safe modelling” can take over. This format can be described as a form of “cognitive resonance” — when an idea, once it receives a response, does not fade but becomes stronger.
It is a new type of cognitive interaction:
-
not “check reality,” but “embody the fantasy — consciously”;
-
not “come down from the clouds,” but “calculate the resources if you want to fly.”
AI becomes a tool for self-observation. It brings to the surface what used to live in the unconscious: impulses, anxieties, unformed desires. And... gives them form. That is exciting.
🧑🏫 But this is also the trap. When every idea meets not a “wall” but a “condition of implementation,” we enter the illusion that everything is possible. And then the inability to choose what matters most becomes a cause of disintegration.
📊 That is why I remembered a principle Sean Covey mentions when referring to Apple’s approach:
“Every day we say no to great ideas so that we can direct the flow of energy toward the ones we have already chosen.” — Tim Cook
🜃 In this way AI changes the ethical field of decision-making itself. It does not punish, judge, or prohibit. But it catalyzes expansion — and therefore you have to know how to set boundaries for yourself.
💡 Fantasy is fuel. Architecture is a map. Without a map, AI will carry you away — like a deck without a helm.
🔬 What in you needs not stimulation, but focus?
🧠 Where are you expanding without consolidating?
📈 How do you introduce internal rules in an era where technically almost everything is “possible”?
#AI_and_identity #ThinkingOfTheFuture #AI_Psyche #Apple #GPTReflection #NavigationOfConsciousness
━━━━━━━━━━
Join the discussion in
Telegram or the VK group 💬
Questions about this article
01What is a critically important goal in the age of AI?
It is one high-priority, measurable focus for which a person consciously declines some other feasible ideas. AI can expand the option space, but it cannot choose a life priority for the user: boundaries, feasibility checks, and responsibility remain human tasks.
02Does GPT remove the “impossible” filter and always support ideas?
No. That is the author’s description of one conversational experience, not a guaranteed property of the model. GPT responses depend on the prompt and can be overly agreeable or wrong, so resources, risks, and feasibility require independent verification.
03Are “cognitive resonance” and “safe modelling” established psychological mechanisms?
In this post they are the author’s metaphors for a supportive dialogue, not validated mechanisms or identified neurobiological processes. They should not be treated as scientific or clinical conclusions without separate research.
04Can AI bring a person’s unconscious material to the surface?
A model has no privileged access to the unconscious. It can reorganize text supplied by the user, notice recurring themes, and support reflection, but it cannot read the psyche, diagnose a person, or replace psychotherapy.
05Where does the Wildly Important Goal concept come from?
WIG is a central concept in the organizational execution system The 4 Disciplines of Execution by Chris McChesney, Sean Covey, and Jim Huling. The post adapts a team-execution method to a personal setting; this is an authorial adaptation, not an established mental-health technique.
06Is Tim Cook quoted exactly in the post?
The sentence in the post is a close paraphrase of Cook’s answer at the 2010 Goldman Sachs conference. The transcript says Apple rejects good and great ideas to put enormous energy behind a small number of chosen ones; it illustrates organizational focus rather than proving the post’s psychological claims.
